As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

How much sway case regulation holds might range by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances in the current case. To check out this concept, consider the following case law definition.

ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release being a legally recognized conviction. Read more

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to do absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that more info evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established with the government.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.

Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Summaries give a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, and the procedural aspects of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.